Reasoning with Conditional Preferences

نویسندگان

  • Shaoju Chen
  • Scott Buffett
  • Michael W. Fleming
چکیده

Before an autonomous agent can perform automated negotiation on behalf of a user in an electronic commerce transaction, the user’s preferences over the set of outcomes must be learned as accurately as possible. This paper presents a structure, a Conditional Outcome Preference Network (COP-network), for modeling preferences directly elicited from a user. The COP-network then expands to indicate all preferences that can be inferred as a result. The network can be easily checked for consistency and redundancy, and can be used to determine quickly whether one outcome is preferred over another. An important feature of the COPnetwork is that conditional preferences, where a user’s preference over outcomes depends on whether particular attribute values are included, can be modeled and inferred as well. If the agent also knows the user’s utilities for some of the possible outcomes, then these can be considered in the COP-network as well. Three techniques for estimating utilities based on the specified preferences and utilities are described. One such technique, which works by first estimating utilities for long chains of outcomes for which preferences are known, is shown to be the most effective.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comprehension of factual, nonfactual, and counterfactual conditionals by Iranian EFL learners

A considerable amount of studies have been established on conditional reasoning supporting mental model theory of propositional reasoning. Mental model theory proposed by Johnson- larid and Byrne is an explanation of someone's thought process about how something occurs in the real world. Conditional reasoning as a kind of reasoning is the way to speak about possibilities or probabilities. The a...

متن کامل

A Stratified Framework for Handling Conditional Preferences

Representing and reasoning over different forms of preferences is of crucial importance to many different fields, especially where numerical comparisons need to be made between critical options. Focusing on the well-known Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) method, we propose a two-layered framework for addressing different kinds of conditional preferences which include partial information ov...

متن کامل

A stratified framework for handling conditional preferences: An extension of the analytic hierarchy process

Representing and reasoning over different forms of preferences is of crucial importance to many different fields, especially where numerical comparisons need to be made between critical options. Focusing on the well-known Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) method, we propose a two-layered framework for addressing different kinds of conditional preferences which include partial information ov...

متن کامل

Reasoning about controllable and uncontrollable variables

We consider the extension of non-monotonic preference logic with the distinction between controllable (or endogenous) and uncontrollable (or exogenous) variables, which can be used for example in agent decision making and deliberation. We assume that the agent is optimistic about its own controllables and pessimistic about its uncontrollables, and we study ways to merge these two distinct dimen...

متن کامل

A Modal Characterization of Defeasible Deontic Conditionals and Conditional Goals

We explore the notions of permission and obligation and their role in knowledge representation, especially as guides to action for planning systems. We first present a simple conditional deontic logic (or more accurately a preference logic) of the type common in the literature and demonstrate its equivalence to a number of modal and conditional systems for default reasoning. We show how the tec...

متن کامل

Hard and soft constraints for reasoning about qualitative conditional preferences

Many real life optimization problems are defined in terms of both hard and soft constraints, and qualitative conditional preferences. However, there is as yet no single framework for combined reasoning about these three kinds of information. In this paper we study how to exploit classical and soft constraint solvers for handling qualitative preference statements such as those captured by the CP...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006